|
About Us
Our
Members
Members Only
SFPA Meetings
Weekly Newsletter
Industry Events
Calendar
Marketing Initiatives
International Activities
Wood
& the Environment
Helpful Links
For Media
Contact Us
|
|
The Environmentally Friendly
Choice
Wood may be the most environmentally friendly
material available for building homes or businesses. Here's why.
-
Non-wood products are environmentally expensive. The supplies of ores and
petroleum for their production are finite; once gone, they are gone forever.
Wood, on the other hand, is a renewable resource. Non-wood products require
far more energy to manufacture than wood: for example – nine times as much for
a steel stud as for a wood stud. That further depletes supplies of fossil
fuels and coal, not to mention increased pollution of the air and water.*
-
Study
after study in Europe, North America and elsewhere has shown that wood
outperforms other products when considered over its complete life cycle. One
study, conducted by
the Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials (CORRIM)
compared the environmental impacts of homes framed with wood and steel in
Minneapolis and with wood and concrete in Atlanta – the framing types most common
to each city. According to the report, the homes framed in steel and concrete
would require 17 and 16 percent more energy respectively (from extraction
through maintenance) than their wood framed counterparts.**
Derived from a Healthy Source
A
recent study from the
Society of American Foresters
reports that the United States has about 750 million acres of forestland, a
number that has remained relatively stable for the past 100 years. Other
positive notes include:
-
On average, 11 percent of the world's forestland
benefits from some type of conservation effort;
-
Historical trends indicate that the standing
inventory (volume of growing stock) of hardwood and softwood tree species in
U.S. forests grew 49 percent between 1953 and 2006;
-
An estimated 25 percent of U.S. private forestland
is managed in accordance with one of the three major forest certification
programs Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI), Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)
and American Tree Farm System (ATFS).
Costs Less
A study
of two almost identical homes – one framed with wood, one with cold-formed steel
– showed the builder’s cost for the steel-framed home was 14.2 percent higher
than the wood-framed home. The steel-framing package cost (framing labor and
material) was 42.4 percent higher than that of a wood-framing package. Total
framing time (labor hours) for the steel house was 4.3 percent higher, and the
framing material cost was 43.5 percent higher. The report's authors caution that
cost differences can vary depending on labor markets and other factors.***
Know the Facts
Using wood makes the most sense when it comes to
protecting our environmental health. For more information, see these "Wood and
Green Building" fact sheets produced by the Wood Promotion Network:
*From
Wood Products Enhance Our
Environment by the Southern Forest Products Association and Southern
Pine Council.
** From Wood and Green Building, a series of
fact sheets produced by the Wood Promotion Network. Copies available at
www.beconstructive.com or above.
***
From Steel vs. Wood, Cost Comparison, Beaufort Demonstration Homes, a
PATH research report prepared by NAHB Research Center for the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the North American Steel Framing Alliance
and the National Association of Home Builders. |